Thursday, February 11, 2016

"The Things They Carried" -Sydney Derrow 1

On page 14 & 15, Tim O'Brien talked about how they had no sense of mission. They had no idea what they were doing more than half the time. O'Brien said, " By daylight they took sniper fire, at night they were mortared, but it was not battle, it was just the endless march, village to village, without purpose, nothing won or lost. They marched for the sake of the march. They plotted along slowly, dumbly, leaning forward against the heat, unthinking, all blood and bone,  simple grunts, soldiering with their legs, toiling up the hills and down to the paddies in across the rivers  and up again and down, just humping, one stop and then the next and then another, but no violation, no will, because it was automatic, it was anatomy, and the war was entirely a matter of posture and carriage, the hump was everything, it kind of inertia, a kind of emptiness, dullness of desire and intellect and conscience and hope and human sensibility. Their principles were in their feet. Their calculations were biological. They had no sense of strategy or mission.  They search the villages without knowing what to look for, not caring, kicking over jars of rice, frisking children and old men, blowing tunnels, sometimes setting fires and sometimes not, forming up and moving onto the next village, then other villages, where he would always be the same." Why did they have no idea what they were doing? Were they trained for war? In my opinion, I believe they weren't trained. I believe half of them didn't even want to be there. O'Brien and his men he wandered aimlessly, lived day by day, and going village to village, for what? Did they even know what they were looking for? - Sydney Derrow

4 comments:

  1. The day to day struggle of war can become repetitive. Days run together and you may get into some sense of repetitiveness. There are some days you may wonder why you are here, what are we trying to accomplish and what have we accomplished? They would have to be trained. The army would never send men overseas to risk their lives and defend the country without the proper training. I do agree with you saying that they did not really know what their overall mission was and what the reasoning was for sending them to wherever in the world they are on this specific day.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Day to day struggle is my comment. -Brice Lucas

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I believe they had no sense of purpose in the war because few of them were really invested in it. Many of the soldiers were drafted and didn't understand the circumstances behind why the war was being fought. O'Brien himself mentions this, when he's talking about his time before joining. It's one thing to fight a war in which you feel the cause is just(or at least the government runs a convincing enough propaganda campaign to make you think it's just), and another thing entirely to not even understand why your there. Take WW2, for instance. Soldiers had a real enemy to look at, there was obvious injustice being done, so they were motivated. But Vietnam? Not the same at all.

    -Ethan Cantrell

    ReplyDelete